MMC-HVDC输电系统直流故障隔离综述

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (2)

Download: PDF (13811 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Flexible HVDC transmission based on modular multilevel converter is a new type of flexible transmission method. Compared with AC transmission technology, MMC-HVDC transmission technology has the characteristics of large transmission capacity, long transmission distance and lower loss. Modular multilevel converter (MMC) with half-bridge sub-modules (SMs) is the most promising technology for high voltage direct current (HVDC) grids, but it lacks the capability of DC fault clearing. The paper briefly introduces the reasons for the failure of the half-bridge MMC. Overview of current research status of DC fault isolation technology for current MMC-HVDC transmission system at home and abroad. Finally, combined with the current research status, the new research direction of DC fault protection for MMC-HVDC transmission system is prospected.

Key words： modular multilevel converter (MMC) DC fault isolation flexible DC transmission system

Received: 26 June 2018 Published: 15 January 2019

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	Zhou Haihong
	Yang Mingfa
	Ruan Junfeng

Cite this article:

Zhou Haihong,Yang Mingfa,Ruan Junfeng. Summarization of DC fault isolation in MMC-HVDC transmission system[J]. Electrical Engineering, 2019, 20(1): 1-6.

URL:

http://dqjs.cesmedia.cn/EN/Y2019/V20/I1/1

[1] 李国庆, 孙银锋, 吴学光. 柔性直流输电稳定性分析及控制参数整定[J]. 电工技术学报, 2017, 32(6): 231-239.
[2] 安婷, Andersen B, Macleod N, et al.中欧高压直流电网技术论坛综述[J]. 电网技术, 2017(8): 2407-2416.
[3] Cwikowski O, Wickramasinghe H R, Konstantinou G, et al.Modular multilevel converter DC fault pro- tection[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 2018, 33(1): 291-300.
[4] Lesnicar A, Marquardt R. An innovative modular multilevel converter topology suitable for a wide power range[C]//Power Tech Conference Proceedings, 2003 IEEE Bologna.IEEE, 2004: 6 pp. Vol.3.
[5] 李家羊, 岑韬, 张磊, 等. 提高柔性直流输电换流阀阀控系统性能的方法研究[J]. 电气技术, 2017, 18(12): 152-156.
[6] 陈继开, 孙川, 李国庆, 等. 双极MMC-HVDC系统直流故障特性研究[J]. 电工技术学报, 2017, 32(10): 53-60.
[7] Kontos E, Tsolaridis G, Teodorescu R, et al.Full- bridge MMC DC fault ride-through and STATCOM operation in multi-terminal HVDC grids[J]. Bulletin of the Polish Academy of Sciences-Technical Sciences, 2017, 65(5): 653-662.
[8] 赵鹏豪. 具有直流故障自清除能力的MMC拓扑和可靠性分析方法[D]. 北京: 华北电力大学, 2016.
[9] Lan Tongkun, Li Yinhong, Duan Xianzhong, et al.Simplified analytic approach of Pole-to-Pole faults in MMC-HVDC for AC system backup protection setting calculation[J]. Energies, 2018, 11(2): 264.
[10] Park J D, Candelaria J.Fault detection and isolation in Low-Voltage DC-Bus microgrid system[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 2013, 28(2): 779-787.
[11] 周煜智, 徐政, 唐庚. 三种MMC-HVDC直流故障处理方法下电力系统暂态稳定性分析[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2015, 35(7): 1621-1627.
[12] 戴志辉, 葛红波, Peter, 等. 柔性直流配电网故障识别与隔离策略综述[J]. 华北电力大学学报: 自然科学版, 2017, 44(4): 19-28.
[13] Xue S, Lian Jie, Qi Jinlong, et al.Pole-to-Ground fault analysis and fast protection scheme for HVDC based on overhead transmission lines[J]. Energies, 2017, 10(7): 1059.
[14] 赵成勇, 李探, 俞露杰, 等. MMC-HVDC直流单极接地故障分析与换流站故障恢复策略[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2014, 34(21): 3518-3526.
[15] 赵鹏豪, 许建中, 赵成勇, 等. MMC子模块拓扑搜索方法及其直流故障穿越能力定量评估[J]. 华北电力大学学报: 自然科学版, 2016, 43(5): 14-21.
[16] Li Xiaoqian, Song Qiang, Liu Wenhua, et al.Pro- tection of nonpermanent faults on DC overhead lines in MMC-Based HVDC systems[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 2013, 28(1): 483-490.
[17] 李斌, 李晔, 何佳伟. 基于模块化多电平换流器的直流系统故障处理方案[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2016, 36(7): 1944-1950.
[18] 孙栩, 朱晋, 刘文龙, 等. 一种具有故障隔离能力的MMC-HVDC换流站子模块拓扑研究[J]. 电力自动化设备, 2017, 37(3): 120-125.
[19] 张建坡, 颜湘武, 田新成. MMC-HVDC混合阻断拓扑直流故障抑制[J]. 电工技术学报, 2017, 32(10): 61-68.
[20] 杨晓峰, 薛尧, 陈博伟, 等. 具有直流故障阻断能力的逆阻型模块化多电平换流器[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2017, 37(4): 1177-1186.
[21] 张峻榤, 向往, 林卫星, 等. 基于混合型MMC和直流开关的柔性直流电网直流故障保护研究[J]. 电力建设, 2017, 38(8): 52-58.
[22] Oliveira R, Yazdani A.A modular multilevel converter with DC fault handling capability and enhanced efficiency for HVDC system applications[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, 2016, 32(1): 11-22.
[23] 唐立, 袁旭峰, 李宁, 等. 具有直流故障电流阻断能力的MMC子模块拓扑结构研究[J]. 电网与清洁能源, 2017, 33(5): 31-39.
[24] 朱明琳, 杭丽君, 李国杰. 基于不对称双子模块的混合MMC及其直流故障自清除能力[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2017, 41(17): 66-71.
[25] Xu Jianzhong, Zhao Penghao, Zhao Chengyong.Reliability analysis and redundancy configuration of MMC with hybrid submodule topologies[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, 2016, 31(4): 2720-2729.
[26] Xu J, Bakran M M.Fault handling methods and comparison for different DC breaker topologies and MMC topologies of the HVDC system[J]. 2018: 1-12.
[27] Peftitsis D, Jehle A, Biela J.Design considerations and performance evaluation of hybrid DC circuit breakers for HVDC grids[C]//2016 18th European Conference on Power Electronics and Applications (EPE'16 ECCE EUROPE), 2016: 1-11.
[28] Cwikowski O, Wood A, Miller A, et al.Operating DC circuit breakers with MMC[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 2018, 33(1): 260-270.
[29] 李帅, 赵成勇, 许建中, 等. 一种新型限流式高压直流断路器拓扑[J]. 电工技术学报, 2017, 32(17): 102-110.
[30] 彭发喜, 汪震, 邓银秋, 等. 混合式直流断路器在柔性直流电网应用初探[J/OL]. 电网技术, 1-7 (2017-09-01).
[31] 康成, 吴军辉, 钟建英, 等. 一种含限流限压功能的混合式直流断路器方案[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2017, 37(4): 1037-1044.
[32] 高阳, 贺之渊, 王成昊, 等. 一种新型混合式直流断路器[J]. 电网技术, 2016, 40(5): 1320-1325.
[33] 朱晋, 刘单华, 尹靖元, 等. 基于模块级联技术的混合型高压直流断路器研究[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2017, 37(5): 1560-1568.
[34] 魏晓光, 杨兵建, 汤广福. 高压直流断路器技术发展与工程实践[J]. 电网技术, 2017, 41(10): 3180-3188.
[35] Elserougi A A, Abdel-Khalik A S, Massoud A M. A new protection scheme for HVDC converters against DC-side faults with current suppression capability[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 2014, 29(4): 1569-1577.
[36] 郭敬梅, 曾德辉, 王钢, 等. 基于辅助电路的MMC- HVDC直流故障处理策略[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2016, 40(16): 90-97.
[37] 谢志德, 杨明发. 基于混合旁路MMC-HVDC直流故障隔离技术研究[J]. 电气技术, 2017, 18(11): 39-43.
[38] 宋强, 杨文博, 李笑倩, 等. 集成直流断路器功能的模块化多电平换流器[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2017, 37(20): 6004-6013.
[39] Liu Gaoren, Xu Feng, Xu Zheng, et al.Assembly HVDC breaker for HVDC grids with modular multilevel converters[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, 2017, 32(2): 931-941.