储能技术课程与思政教育融合的教学改革研究

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (3)

Download: PDF (886 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract This paper takes the professional course of Energy Storage Technology and Applications as an example, exploring the deep integration of the course with ideological and political education. It highlights the issue of traditional teaching emphasizing skills over values, stressing that such integration can cultivate essential values like energy security awareness and green development concepts, which are crucial for fostering well-rounded talent in the energy storage field. The study analyzes the knowledge system of energy storage technology, covering physical, electrochemical and electromagnetic storage types and their current status, while identifying teaching challenges such as rapid technological iteration and abstract formulas. It further excavates ideological and political elements embedded in each knowledge module. A systematic integration model is constructed, encompassing target, content, method, and evaluation layers, proposing pathways like bidirectional reconstruction of teaching objectives, case-driven content design, diversified teaching strategies, and a three-dimensional assessment mechanism. To address practical difficulties such as forced embedding of ideological elements and teachers’ limited interdisciplinary capabilities, strategies like faculty training, resource development, and industry-education collaboration are proposed. The research achieves a tripartite synergy of knowledge imparting, skill development, and value shaping, with future plans to expand discussions on ethical issues in cutting-edge technologies and global energy governance modules, thereby providing support for related talent cultivation.

Key words： course teaching ideological and political education course reform teaching innovation

Received: 30 September 2025

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	WU Chunling
	YU Lei
	LI Yanbo
	CHEN Junshuo

Cite this article:

WU Chunling,YU Lei,LI Yanbo等. Research on teaching reform of integrating energy storage technology courses with ideological and political education[J]. Electrical Engineering, 2026, 27(6): 30-36.

URL:

https://dqjs.cesmedia.cn/EN/Y2026/V27/I6/30

[1] 国家发展改革委, 国家能源局. 能源生产和消费革命战略(2016—2030)[Z]. 北京, 2016.
[2] 中国人民共和国教育部. 教育部关于印发《加强碳达峰碳中和高等教育人才培养体系建设工作方案》的通知[EB/OL].[2026-03-16]. http://www.moe.gov.cn/ srcsite/A08/s7056/202205/t20220506_625229.html.
[3] 李巾锭, 樊林浩, 张寿行, 等. “1+N+X”产教融合协同育人模式在储能专业人才培养中的探索与实践[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2024, 13(6): 2099-2106.
[4] 张彦云. 大学数学微课程建设与应用的发展方向[J]. 教育观察, 2020, 9(6): 38-39, 48.
[5] 黄国勇, 王春霞, 温嘉玮, 等. 储能学科专业人才培养体系建设及实践探索[J]. 高教学刊, 2023, 9(36): 173-176.
[6] 王月, 许静, 周倩羽, 等. 基于一流课程建设的分析化学教学改革与实践[J]. 化学教育, 2023, 44(20): 20-26.
[7] 石敏, 陈翌庆, 许育东. 新能源材料与器件专业建设与人才培养模式探讨: 以合肥工业大学为例[J]. 合肥工业大学学报(社会科学版), 2016, 30(4): 127-132.
[8] 高小飞, 王育飞, 薛花, 等. 电力储能产业与数字电子技术课程产教融合初探[J]. 中国电力教育, 2023(5): 57-58.
[9] 王庆锋, 马艳娥, 汪晓男, 等. 面向“双碳”目标人才培养的工业化课程教学改革探索与实践[J]. 高教学刊, 2024, 10(19): 135-138.
[10] 李秀万. 《储能技术》课程教学探讨[J]. 教育现代化, 2019, 6(50): 138-139.
[11] 陈铎, 董红潮, 冷建材, 等. 工程教育认证背景下教学评一体化促进电路分析与原理课程改革实施[J]. 电气技术, 2025, 26(8): 74-79, 84.
[12] 王荔芳, 刘庆雪, 黄钺. 电力系统分析课程改革研究与实践[J]. 电气技术, 2025, 26(7): 51-55.
[13] 高健, 金韦利, 文斌. 融入课程思政的单片机课程教学改革探索与实践[J]. 电气技术, 2024, 25(10): 67-71.
[14] 朱娟娟, 贺王鹏, 郭宝龙. 新工科电气电子类课程改革与实践: 以“信号与系统”为例[J]. 电气技术, 2024, 25(10): 72-78.
[15] 贲彤, 陈龙. 融入课程思政理念的电工学教学改革探索与实践[J]. 电气技术, 2024, 25(1): 48-51.