|
|
|
| The bus-coupler current abnormal solution of double bus with subsection |
| Zhu Junhong, Hu Bao, Zhang Xiaobo, Song Guie |
| XJ Electric Co., Ltd, Xuchang, He’nan 461000 |
|
|
|
|
Abstract In the case of abnormal bus-coupler current (such as current transformer wired-break, sampled value chain break, etc.) in double bus with subsection connection, if the busbar not adjacent to the bus-coupler fails, the busbar differential protection may mistakenly trip the bus-coupler element. This paper analyzes the causes of the problems. based on the existing large differential protection and small differential protection, proposed increasing the the medium differential protection to select the fault busbar, so as to ensure that the busbar differential protection can correctly select the tripping element and not trip the irrelevant element when the bus-coupler current is abnormal. The correctness of the scheme is verified by real time digital simulation.
|
|
Received: 01 April 2019
Published: 29 September 2019
|
|
|
|
| Cite this article: |
|
Zhu Junhong,Hu Bao,Zhang Xiaobo等. The bus-coupler current abnormal solution of double bus with subsection[J]. Electrical Engineering, 2019, 20(10): 75-79.
|
|
|
|
| URL: |
|
https://dqjs.cesmedia.cn/EN/Y2019/V20/I10/75
|
[1] 朱声石. 高压电网继电保护原理与技术[M]. 2版. 北京: 中国电力出版社, 1995.
[2] 贺家李, 宋从矩. 电力系统继电保护原理[M]. 3版.北京: 中国电力出版社, 1998.
[3] 车晓骏, 杨波, 徐军, 等. 双母双分段母线保护配置及母联分段开关失灵和死区保护动作分析[J]. 电气技术, 2017, 18(6): 91-94, 98.
[4] 黄继东, 肖锋, 王智勇, 等. 母线保护刀闸位置异常时的自适应校正[J]. 电力系统保护与控制, 2016, 44(6): 122-127.
[5] 李新, 熊炬, 董泉, 等. 基于母联断路器为跳闸对象的保护方案综述[J]. 电力系统保护与控制, 2010, 38(22): 242-246.
[6] 曹建东, 张弛, 李一泉. 母线差动保护电流互感器断线闭锁功能存在问题及其改进方法[J]. 广东电力, 2012, 25(4): 81-83, 87.
[7] 唐治国, 陈琦, 周小波, 等. 母线保护电流互感器断线判据的分析及改进判据[J]. 电力自动化设备, 2018, 38(4): 210-217.
[8] 冯顺, 曲欣, 王毅, 等. 某变电站500kV母线保护TA断线保护闭锁分析[J]. 电气技术, 2017, 18(7): 113-116.
[9] 国家电网公司. Q/GDW1175—2013. 变压器、高压并联电抗器和母线保护及辅助装置标准化设计规范[S].
[10] 王乐, 黄俊. 浅谈电气保护中的大差小差[C]//江苏省电机工程学会2010年学术年会暨第四届电力安全论坛论文集, 2010: 269-271.
[11] 钱碧甫, 陈刚, 林高翔, 等. 220kV变电站220kV母线保护双重化改造实例分析[J]. 电气技术, 2014, 15(12): 81-84, 94. |
|
|
|
2019, Vol. 20 
