产教融合视域下电气类专业“项目驱动”创新人才培养路径探索

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (2)

Download: PDF (768 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Against the backdrop of deepening integration of industry and education, the cultivation of talents in electrical majors needs to break through the traditional mode of theoretical indoctrination to meet the urgent demand of the industry for innovative talents. As the core carrier of industry-education integration, the “project-driven” approach provides students with immersive innovative practice scenarios by introducing real enterprise projects into the teaching process. Based on the disciplinary characteristics of electrical majors, this paper analyzes the mechanism of project-driven approach in cultivating innovative abilities, and explores the existing problems in current practice, such as projects being disconnected from industrial needs, imperfect guidance systems, and a single evaluation standard. Furthermore, it proposes specific cultivation paths from four dimensions: construction of project system, development of dual-teacher teams, the remolding of teaching modes, and innovation of evaluation mechanisms. Combined with case studies to verify its effectiveness, this paper aims to provide references for deepening the industry-education integration and cultivating innovative talents in electrical majors.

Key words： integration of industry and education project-driven electrical majors innovative ability practical path

Received: 01 October 2025

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	ZHU Chengxi
	YU Yang

Cite this article:

ZHU Chengxi,YU Yang. Exploration on the cultivation path of innovative talents with “project-driven” mode for electrical majors from the perspective of integration of industry and education[J]. Electrical Engineering, 2026, 27(5): 59-64.

URL:

https://dqjs.cesmedia.cn/EN/Y2026/V27/I5/59

[1] 贾红丹, 迟耀丹, 魏立明, 等. 电气类开放实验教学体系改革与实践[J]. 电气技术, 2025, 26(10): 38-41, 48.
[2] 顾菊平, 堵俊, 华亮, 等. 高等工程教育产教融合互信机制研究[J]. 高等工程教育研究, 2021(2): 94-98.
[3] 张蓉, 文劲宇, 李红斌, 等. 新工科背景下课程思政系统设计与实施[J]. 电工技术学报, 2023, 38(11): 3094-3100.
[4] Pilz M, Wiemann K.Does dual training make the world go round? Training models in German com- panies in China, India and Mexico[J]. Vocations and Learning, 2021, 14(1): 95-114.
[5] Widiyaningtyas T, Dwiyanto F A, Wibawa A P.CDIO- based data structure practical coursebook[J]. World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education, 2019, 17(2): 164-169.
[6] Bhattacharya S, Chatterjee A.Digital project driven supply chains: a new paradigm[J]. Supply Chain Management, 2022, 27(2): 283-294.
[7] 赵巍胜. 以“三个有组织”推进卓越工程师产教融合培养改革[J]. 中国高等教育, 2024(22): 29-33.
[8] 邓白君, 吴隽. 产教融合视域下企业问题转化为教学场景的系统化路径研究: 基于“专创融合”课程开发工具的实践探索[J]. 高等工程教育研究, 2025(增刊1): 226-233.
[9] 朱娟娟, 贺王鹏, 郭宝龙. 新工科电气电子类课程改革与实践: 以“信号与系统”为例[J]. 电气技术, 2024, 25(10): 72-78.
[10] 左鹏. 试论作为课程育人实现方式的学科实践[J]. 课程·教材·教法, 2023, 43(12): 37-43.
[11] 贾圣钰, 施博辰, 赵争鸣, 等. 电力电子与电机系统的“电-机-热”多学科能量统一建模及分析[J]. 电工技术学报, 2025, 40(20): 6577-6590.
[12] 储昭卫. 工程博士实践成果评价的流程、标准与体系: 荷兰4TU工程博士项目评价经验与启示[J]. 学位与研究生教育, 2025(7): 9-16.
[13] 刘丹, 冯述虎, 高菁. 应用型高校“双师型”教师职业能力发展路径研究[J]. 黑龙江高教研究, 2025, 43(10): 128-136.
[14] 周福辉, 吴伟, 张小飞, 等. 以重大项目群为牵引的空天信息人工智能课程体系建设[J]. 高等工程教育研究, 2024(2): 84-90.